Transformative AI Bubble: Hype, Unicorns, and the Road to Real Value

In 2025, it feels like déjà vu. AI startups are raising at breakneck speed, valuations are soaring, and headlines gush about “one-person unicorns.” Venture capital is flowing as if it’s free again, and companies are raising $200M rounds just to “stay in the game.”

If this sounds familiar, it should. The last time we saw this kind of frenzy was the dot-com bubble. Back then, too, innovation was real - but capital allocation was irrational. The result was a flood of startups that burned bright and collapsed quickly, while a handful of disciplined companies (Amazon, Google) quietly built enduring businesses.

We are now living through the transformative AI bubble. The question isn’t whether AI is real. It’s how much of today’s hype will actually translate into sustainable, enterprise-grade value.

Bubble Is Real

There’s no denying the signs:

• One-person unicorns is what we are all expecting.
• Companies raising series B weeks after series A before they even have made a meaningful progress.
• AI agents demoed on stage that look magical, but crack under production load.
  
  

But does that one-person unicorn really need $50M investment? How much pizza do you need to buy for the engineering team, how many marketing events can the founder attend?

I recently heard some investors write off MIT’s recent AI assessment article (need reference https://fortune.com/2025/08/18/mit-report-95-percent-generative-ai-pilots-at-companies-failing-cfo/) . Are we firing the authors, because we do not like the message? 

That AI will transform the way we conduct business is clear - granted, we are not investing into satellite connected communication terminals here. 

The funding environment rewards speed and invests in the future is understood. 

But how much of the investment is going into pure spectacle without substance and into false expectations that will ultimately be harmful? 

I know one drop of blood will be sufficient to determine the full health of the patient some day, but not in the immediate future!

One would expect the investment community to have a longer institutional memory.

80% Isn’t Enough

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: building an AI agent that works 80% of the time is relatively easy. With today’s foundation models, you can do that in days.

But enterprises don’t buy 80%. They buy 100%.

“Statistical correctness is fine for demos. In production, you need deterministic behavior. No hallucinations. No sometimes-right. If it’s customer-facing, it must be right.”
– Aleks Gollu, CEO of 11Sight

That last 20% - hardening, guardrails, escalation logic, monitoring, regression-proof releases - is what separates a demo from a business.

And that’s where most bubble-funded AI companies stumble.

Where Value Will Accrue

Value won’t accrue to hype cycles. It will accrue to startups that:

• Deliver production-grade AI that works for 10+ years.
  
  
• Focus on narrow, high-stakes problems where ROI is clear.
  
  
• Build systems with encapsulation, modularity, and unit testing baked in.
  
  
• Earn customer trust by escalating to humans when automation fails.
  
  

In other words: the winners will look less like “one-person unicorns” and more like the next Amazon - boring, relentless, disciplined.

11Sight’s Contrarian Approach

At 11Sight, we made a deliberate choice: don’t boil the ocean.

We focus on voice AI agents that augment - not replace - customer-facing, entry-level roles. That means:

• Service departments handling appointment scheduling and updates.
  
  
• Front desks (auto and hospitality) confirming or modifying reservations.
  
  
• Outbound reminders for recalls and follow-ups.
  
  

Instead of chasing 500 vague outcomes, each agent delivers 9–10 planned outcomes with enterprise reliability. And when the AI can’t resolve an issue in 2–3 turns, it escalates immediately to a human.

The results are measurable:

• Resolution rates improved from 30% → 48% → 60% this year.
  
  
• Dealerships cover the 38% of calls normally missed, booking 28% more appointments.
  
  
• Customers get 24/7/365 service - including at 2 a.m.
  
  

No magic. Just ROI.

Lessons from the Dot-Com Bubble

The dot-com era teaches us that hype doesn’t invalidate innovation. It just distorts the market. After the bubble popped, the real builders emerged stronger.

AI will follow the same arc. Hundreds of well-funded startups will fail because they chase every shiny use case. A few will survive because they picked the right problem, built to enterprise standards, and proved value.

Advice for Investors and Founders

For investors:

• Ask whether the company can survive 10 years of releases, not 10 weeks of demos.
• Look for focus and discipline, not spray-and-pray feature sets.
  
  

For founders:

• Don’t chase every AI trend. Narrow your scope.
• Build for deterministic reliability - especially in customer-facing roles.
  Remember: “getting to 80% is easy. The last 20% is where the moat is.”
  
  

AI is transformative, no question. But we are in a bubble - and bubbles burst.

The winners won’t be the loudest or the fastest. They’ll be the ones who do the hard, unglamorous work of making AI reliable, enterprise-ready, and relentlessly customer-centric.

At 11Sight, we believe that’s the only way forward.

‍